Central African Republic vs Tajikistan: Resolving insolvency - Score

Central African Republic
28.12
in 2019
Tajikistan
28.43
in 2019
Central African Republic rank
153rd
Tajikistan rank
151st

Resolving insolvency - Score over time

  • Central African Republic
  • Tajikistan
0102030200320112019

How they compare

Tajikistan currently reports 28.43 against 28.12 in Central African Republic, a difference of 0.31.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Tajikistan ahead.

Central African Republic ranks 153rd and Tajikistan ranks 151st of 188 countries.

Tajikistan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Central African Republic Tajikistan Difference Ahead
2000s 28.12 32.41 4.28 Tajikistan
2010s 28.12 29.4 1.27 Tajikistan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher resolving insolvency - score, Central African Republic or Tajikistan?
Tajikistan, at 28.43 against 28.12 in Central African Republic as of 2019.
What is the difference in resolving insolvency - score between Central African Republic and Tajikistan?
0.31, with Tajikistan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and Tajikistan?
15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
How do Central African Republic and Tajikistan rank globally for resolving insolvency - score?
Central African Republic ranks 153rd and Tajikistan ranks 151st of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Resolving insolvency - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Resolving insolvency - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 3,083 data points, 2003–2019
Last refreshed

The score for resolving insolvency is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the recovery rate of insolvency proceedings involving domestic entities, as well as the strength of the legal framework applicable to judicial liquidation and reorganization proceedings.