Central African Republic vs Syria: Resolving insolvency - Score

Central African Republic
28.12
in 2019
Syria
27
in 2019
Central African Republic rank
153rd
Syria rank
156th

Resolving insolvency - Score over time

  • Central African Republic
  • Syria
0102030200320112019

How they compare

Central African Republic currently reports 28.12 against 27 in Syria, a difference of 1.12.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 17 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Syria ahead.

Central African Republic ranks 153rd and Syria ranks 156th of 188 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Central African Republic averaged higher in 1 and Syria in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Central African Republic Syria Difference Ahead
2000s 28.12 31.41 3.29 Syria
2010s 28.12 26.33 1.8 Central African Republic

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher resolving insolvency - score, Central African Republic or Syria?
Central African Republic, at 28.12 against 27 in Syria as of 2019.
What is the difference in resolving insolvency - score between Central African Republic and Syria?
1.12, with Central African Republic ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and Syria?
17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
How do Central African Republic and Syria rank globally for resolving insolvency - score?
Central African Republic ranks 153rd and Syria ranks 156th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Resolving insolvency - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Resolving insolvency - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 3,083 data points, 2003–2019
Last refreshed

The score for resolving insolvency is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the recovery rate of insolvency proceedings involving domestic entities, as well as the strength of the legal framework applicable to judicial liquidation and reorganization proceedings.