Cambodia vs United Arab Emirates: Resolving insolvency - Score

Cambodia
48.51
in 2019
United Arab Emirates
49.26
in 2019
Cambodia rank
80th
United Arab Emirates rank
78th

Resolving insolvency - Score over time

  • Cambodia
  • United Arab Emirates
1020304050200320112019

How they compare

United Arab Emirates currently reports 49.26 against 48.51 in Cambodia, a difference of 0.75.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 17 shared years of data; in 2003 it was United Arab Emirates ahead.

Cambodia ranks 80th and United Arab Emirates ranks 78th of 188 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Cambodia averaged higher in 1 and United Arab Emirates in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cambodia United Arab Emirates Difference Ahead
2000s 17.35 39.65 22.3 United Arab Emirates
2010s 47.65 43.27 4.38 Cambodia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher resolving insolvency - score, Cambodia or United Arab Emirates?
United Arab Emirates, at 49.26 against 48.51 in Cambodia as of 2019.
What is the difference in resolving insolvency - score between Cambodia and United Arab Emirates?
0.75, with United Arab Emirates ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cambodia and United Arab Emirates?
17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
How do Cambodia and United Arab Emirates rank globally for resolving insolvency - score?
Cambodia ranks 80th and United Arab Emirates ranks 78th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Resolving insolvency - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Resolving insolvency - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 3,083 data points, 2003–2019
Last refreshed

The score for resolving insolvency is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the recovery rate of insolvency proceedings involving domestic entities, as well as the strength of the legal framework applicable to judicial liquidation and reorganization proceedings.