Burundi vs Papua New Guinea: Resolving insolvency - Score

Burundi
30.61
in 2019
Papua New Guinea
32.16
in 2019
Burundi rank
145th
Papua New Guinea rank
142nd

Resolving insolvency - Score over time

  • Burundi
  • Papua New Guinea
0102030200320112019

How they compare

Papua New Guinea currently reports 32.16 against 30.61 in Burundi, a difference of 1.55.

That makes Papua New Guinea's figure about 1.1 times Burundi's.

Across all 17 years both countries report, Papua New Guinea has been ahead every year.

Burundi ranks 145th and Papua New Guinea ranks 142nd of 188 countries.

Papua New Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Burundi Papua New Guinea Difference Ahead
2000s 20.02 31.27 11.26 Papua New Guinea
2010s 30.71 31.82 1.12 Papua New Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher resolving insolvency - score, Burundi or Papua New Guinea?
Papua New Guinea, at 32.16 against 30.61 in Burundi as of 2019.
What is the difference in resolving insolvency - score between Burundi and Papua New Guinea?
1.55, with Papua New Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Burundi and Papua New Guinea?
17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
How do Burundi and Papua New Guinea rank globally for resolving insolvency - score?
Burundi ranks 145th and Papua New Guinea ranks 142nd of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Resolving insolvency - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Resolving insolvency - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 3,083 data points, 2003–2019
Last refreshed

The score for resolving insolvency is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the recovery rate of insolvency proceedings involving domestic entities, as well as the strength of the legal framework applicable to judicial liquidation and reorganization proceedings.