Japan vs Norway: Resolving insolvency: Recovery rate
Japan
92.1 cents on the dollar
in 2019
Norway
91.9 cents on the dollar
in 2019
Japan rank
1st
Norway rank
2nd
Resolving insolvency: Recovery rate over time
- Japan
- Norway
How they compare
Japan currently reports 92.1 cents on the dollar against 91.9 cents on the dollar in Norway, a difference of 0.2 cents on the dollar.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 17 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Norway ahead.
Japan ranks 1st and Norway ranks 2nd of 190 countries.
Japan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Japan | Norway | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 92.59 cents on the dollar | 90.41 cents on the dollar | 2.17 cents on the dollar | Japan |
| 2010s | 92.52 cents on the dollar | 91.83 cents on the dollar | 0.69 cents on the dollar | Japan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher resolving insolvency: recovery rate, Japan or Norway?
- Japan, at 92.1 cents on the dollar against 91.9 cents on the dollar in Norway as of 2019.
- What is the difference in resolving insolvency: recovery rate between Japan and Norway?
- 0.2 cents on the dollar, with Japan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Japan and Norway?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Japan and Norway rank globally for resolving insolvency: recovery rate?
- Japan ranks 1st and Norway ranks 2nd of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Resolving insolvency: Recovery rate (cents on the dollar). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The recovery rate is recorded as cents on the dollar recovered by secured creditors through judicial reorganization, liquidation or debt enforcement (foreclosure or receivership) proceedings. The calculation takes into account the outcome: whether the business emerges from the proceedings as a going concern or the assets are sold piecemeal.