Syrian Arab Republic vs Viet Nam: Resolving insolvency: Recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - Score
Syrian Arab Republic
22.76
in 2019
Viet Nam
22.97
in 2019
Syrian Arab Republic rank
135th
Viet Nam rank
134th
Resolving insolvency: Recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - Score over time
- Syrian Arab Republic
- Viet Nam
How they compare
Viet Nam currently reports 22.97 against 22.76 in Syrian Arab Republic, a difference of 0.21.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 17 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Syrian Arab Republic ahead.
Syrian Arab Republic ranks 135th and Viet Nam ranks 134th of 191 countries.
Syrian Arab Republic has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Syrian Arab Republic | Viet Nam | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 31.58 | 19.96 | 11.61 | Syrian Arab Republic |
| 2010s | 21.4 | 20.46 | 0.9453 | Syrian Arab Republic |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher resolving insolvency: recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - score, Syrian Arab Republic or Viet Nam?
- Viet Nam, at 22.97 against 22.76 in Syrian Arab Republic as of 2019.
- What is the difference in resolving insolvency: recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - score between Syrian Arab Republic and Viet Nam?
- 0.21, with Viet Nam ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Syrian Arab Republic and Viet Nam?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Syrian Arab Republic and Viet Nam rank globally for resolving insolvency: recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - score?
- Syrian Arab Republic ranks 135th and Viet Nam ranks 134th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Resolving insolvency: Recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for recovery rate benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.