South Africa vs Uzbekistan: Resolving insolvency: Recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - Score
South Africa
37.31
in 2019
Uzbekistan
37.07
in 2019
South Africa rank
93rd
Uzbekistan rank
95th
Resolving insolvency: Recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - Score over time
- South Africa
- Uzbekistan
How they compare
South Africa currently reports 37.31 against 37.07 in Uzbekistan, a difference of 0.24.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 17 shared years of data; in 2003 it was South Africa ahead.
South Africa ranks 93rd and Uzbekistan ranks 95th of 191 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, South Africa averaged higher in 1 and Uzbekistan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | South Africa | Uzbekistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 35.12 | 16.66 | 18.46 | South Africa |
| 2010s | 37.68 | 38.11 | 0.4279 | Uzbekistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher resolving insolvency: recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - score, South Africa or Uzbekistan?
- South Africa, at 37.31 against 37.07 in Uzbekistan as of 2019.
- What is the difference in resolving insolvency: recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - score between South Africa and Uzbekistan?
- 0.24, with South Africa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for South Africa and Uzbekistan?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do South Africa and Uzbekistan rank globally for resolving insolvency: recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - score?
- South Africa ranks 93rd and Uzbekistan ranks 95th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Resolving insolvency: Recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for recovery rate benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.