Sierra Leone vs Ukraine: Resolving insolvency: Recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - Score
Sierra Leone
11.97
in 2019
Ukraine
9.67
in 2019
Sierra Leone rank
159th
Ukraine rank
162nd
Resolving insolvency: Recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - Score over time
- Sierra Leone
- Ukraine
How they compare
Sierra Leone currently reports 11.97 against 9.67 in Ukraine, a difference of 2.3.
That makes Sierra Leone's figure about 1.2 times Ukraine's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 17 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Sierra Leone ahead.
Sierra Leone ranks 159th and Ukraine ranks 162nd of 191 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Sierra Leone averaged higher in 1 and Ukraine in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Sierra Leone | Ukraine | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 9.52 | 10.42 | 0.902 | Ukraine |
| 2010s | 11.08 | 9.93 | 1.15 | Sierra Leone |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher resolving insolvency: recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - score, Sierra Leone or Ukraine?
- Sierra Leone, at 11.97 against 9.67 in Ukraine as of 2019.
- What is the difference in resolving insolvency: recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - score between Sierra Leone and Ukraine?
- 2.3, with Sierra Leone ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Sierra Leone and Ukraine?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Sierra Leone and Ukraine rank globally for resolving insolvency: recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - score?
- Sierra Leone ranks 159th and Ukraine ranks 162nd of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Resolving insolvency: Recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for recovery rate benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.