Paraguay vs Philippines: Resolving insolvency: Recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - Score
Paraguay
24.76
in 2019
Philippines
22.66
in 2019
Paraguay rank
132nd
Philippines rank
135th
Resolving insolvency: Recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - Score over time
- Paraguay
- Philippines
How they compare
Paraguay currently reports 24.76 against 22.66 in Philippines, a difference of 2.1.
That makes Paraguay's figure about 1.1 times Philippines's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 17 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Paraguay ahead.
Paraguay ranks 132nd and Philippines ranks 135th of 190 countries.
Paraguay has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Paraguay | Philippines | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 15.41 | 4.49 | 10.91 | Paraguay |
| 2010s | 20.47 | 17.54 | 2.94 | Paraguay |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher resolving insolvency: recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - score, Paraguay or Philippines?
- Paraguay, at 24.76 against 22.66 in Philippines as of 2019.
- What is the difference in resolving insolvency: recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - score between Paraguay and Philippines?
- 2.1, with Paraguay ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Paraguay and Philippines?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Paraguay and Philippines rank globally for resolving insolvency: recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - score?
- Paraguay ranks 132nd and Philippines ranks 135th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Resolving insolvency: Recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for recovery rate benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.