Papua New Guinea vs Solomon Islands: Resolving insolvency: Recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - Score
Papua New Guinea
26.82
in 2019
Solomon Islands
26.24
in 2019
Papua New Guinea rank
127th
Solomon Islands rank
128th
Resolving insolvency: Recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - Score over time
- Papua New Guinea
- Solomon Islands
How they compare
Papua New Guinea currently reports 26.82 against 26.24 in Solomon Islands, a difference of 0.58.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 17 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Solomon Islands ahead.
Papua New Guinea ranks 127th and Solomon Islands ranks 128th of 191 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Papua New Guinea averaged higher in 1 and Solomon Islands in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Papua New Guinea | Solomon Islands | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 25.05 | 25.14 | 0.0884 | Solomon Islands |
| 2010s | 26.15 | 26.02 | 0.1231 | Papua New Guinea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher resolving insolvency: recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - score, Papua New Guinea or Solomon Islands?
- Papua New Guinea, at 26.82 against 26.24 in Solomon Islands as of 2019.
- What is the difference in resolving insolvency: recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - score between Papua New Guinea and Solomon Islands?
- 0.58, with Papua New Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Papua New Guinea and Solomon Islands?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Papua New Guinea and Solomon Islands rank globally for resolving insolvency: recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - score?
- Papua New Guinea ranks 127th and Solomon Islands ranks 128th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Resolving insolvency: Recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for recovery rate benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.