Panama vs United Arab Emirates: Resolving insolvency: Recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - Score
Panama
29.06
in 2019
United Arab Emirates
29.77
in 2019
Panama rank
124th
United Arab Emirates rank
121st
Resolving insolvency: Recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - Score over time
- Panama
- United Arab Emirates
How they compare
United Arab Emirates currently reports 29.77 against 29.06 in Panama, a difference of 0.71.
Across all 17 years both countries report, United Arab Emirates has been ahead every year.
Panama ranks 124th and United Arab Emirates ranks 121st of 191 countries.
United Arab Emirates has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Panama | United Arab Emirates | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 28.29 | 29.3 | 1.01 | United Arab Emirates |
| 2010s | 29.35 | 30.91 | 1.56 | United Arab Emirates |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher resolving insolvency: recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - score, Panama or United Arab Emirates?
- United Arab Emirates, at 29.77 against 29.06 in Panama as of 2019.
- What is the difference in resolving insolvency: recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - score between Panama and United Arab Emirates?
- 0.71, with United Arab Emirates ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Panama and United Arab Emirates?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Panama and United Arab Emirates rank globally for resolving insolvency: recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - score?
- Panama ranks 124th and United Arab Emirates ranks 121st of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Resolving insolvency: Recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for recovery rate benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.