Panama vs Papua New Guinea: Resolving insolvency: Recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - Score
Panama
29.06
in 2019
Papua New Guinea
26.82
in 2019
Panama rank
124th
Papua New Guinea rank
127th
Resolving insolvency: Recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - Score over time
- Panama
- Papua New Guinea
How they compare
Panama currently reports 29.06 against 26.82 in Papua New Guinea, a difference of 2.24.
That makes Panama's figure about 1.1 times Papua New Guinea's.
Across all 17 years both countries report, Panama has been ahead every year.
Panama ranks 124th and Papua New Guinea ranks 127th of 191 countries.
Panama has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Panama | Papua New Guinea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 28.29 | 25.05 | 3.24 | Panama |
| 2010s | 29.35 | 26.15 | 3.2 | Panama |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher resolving insolvency: recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - score, Panama or Papua New Guinea?
- Panama, at 29.06 against 26.82 in Papua New Guinea as of 2019.
- What is the difference in resolving insolvency: recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - score between Panama and Papua New Guinea?
- 2.24, with Panama ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Panama and Papua New Guinea?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Panama and Papua New Guinea rank globally for resolving insolvency: recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - score?
- Panama ranks 124th and Papua New Guinea ranks 127th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Resolving insolvency: Recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for recovery rate benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.