North Macedonia vs Switzerland: Resolving insolvency: Recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - Score
North Macedonia
51.7
in 2019
Switzerland
50.29
in 2019
North Macedonia rank
49th
Switzerland rank
51st
Resolving insolvency: Recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - Score over time
- North Macedonia
- Switzerland
How they compare
North Macedonia currently reports 51.7 against 50.29 in Switzerland, a difference of 1.41.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 17 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Switzerland ahead.
North Macedonia ranks 49th and Switzerland ranks 51st of 191 countries.
Switzerland has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | North Macedonia | Switzerland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 42.34 | 49.43 | 7.09 | Switzerland |
| 2010s | 48.32 | 50.21 | 1.9 | Switzerland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher resolving insolvency: recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - score, North Macedonia or Switzerland?
- North Macedonia, at 51.7 against 50.29 in Switzerland as of 2019.
- What is the difference in resolving insolvency: recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - score between North Macedonia and Switzerland?
- 1.41, with North Macedonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for North Macedonia and Switzerland?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do North Macedonia and Switzerland rank globally for resolving insolvency: recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - score?
- North Macedonia ranks 49th and Switzerland ranks 51st of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Resolving insolvency: Recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for recovery rate benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.