Montenegro vs North Macedonia: Resolving insolvency: Recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - Score
Montenegro
54.17
in 2019
North Macedonia
51.7
in 2019
Montenegro rank
46th
North Macedonia rank
49th
Resolving insolvency: Recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - Score over time
- Montenegro
- North Macedonia
How they compare
Montenegro currently reports 54.17 against 51.7 in North Macedonia, a difference of 2.47.
Across all 14 years both countries report, Montenegro has been ahead every year.
Montenegro ranks 46th and North Macedonia ranks 49th of 191 countries.
Montenegro has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Montenegro | North Macedonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 46.27 | 43.72 | 2.55 | Montenegro |
| 2010s | 51.46 | 48.32 | 3.15 | Montenegro |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher resolving insolvency: recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - score, Montenegro or North Macedonia?
- Montenegro, at 54.17 against 51.7 in North Macedonia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in resolving insolvency: recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - score between Montenegro and North Macedonia?
- 2.47, with Montenegro ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Montenegro and North Macedonia?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2019.
- How do Montenegro and North Macedonia rank globally for resolving insolvency: recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - score?
- Montenegro ranks 46th and North Macedonia ranks 49th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Resolving insolvency: Recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for recovery rate benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.