Republic of Moldova vs Peru: Resolving insolvency: Recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - Score
Republic of Moldova
34.57
in 2019
Peru
33.74
in 2019
Republic of Moldova rank
99th
Peru rank
102nd
Resolving insolvency: Recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - Score over time
- Republic of Moldova
- Peru
How they compare
Republic of Moldova currently reports 34.57 against 33.74 in Peru, a difference of 0.83.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 17 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Peru ahead.
Republic of Moldova ranks 99th and Peru ranks 102nd of 190 countries.
Republic of Moldova has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Republic of Moldova | Peru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 30.49 | 29.82 | 0.6685 | Republic of Moldova |
| 2010s | 32.62 | 31.28 | 1.34 | Republic of Moldova |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher resolving insolvency: recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - score, Republic of Moldova or Peru?
- Republic of Moldova, at 34.57 against 33.74 in Peru as of 2019.
- What is the difference in resolving insolvency: recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - score between Republic of Moldova and Peru?
- 0.83, with Republic of Moldova ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Republic of Moldova and Peru?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Republic of Moldova and Peru rank globally for resolving insolvency: recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - score?
- Republic of Moldova ranks 99th and Peru ranks 102nd of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Resolving insolvency: Recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for recovery rate benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.