Malaysia vs Taiwan, China: Resolving insolvency: Recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - Score
Malaysia
87.2
in 2019
Taiwan, China
88.5
in 2019
Malaysia rank
18th
Taiwan, China rank
16th
Resolving insolvency: Recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - Score over time
- Malaysia
- Taiwan, China
How they compare
Taiwan, China currently reports 88.5 against 87.2 in Malaysia, a difference of 1.3.
Across all 17 years both countries report, Taiwan, China has been ahead every year.
Malaysia ranks 18th and Taiwan, China ranks 16th of 191 countries.
Taiwan, China has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malaysia | Taiwan, China | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 41.5 | 86.83 | 45.33 | Taiwan, China |
| 2010s | 72.52 | 88.29 | 15.77 | Taiwan, China |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher resolving insolvency: recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - score, Malaysia or Taiwan, China?
- Taiwan, China, at 88.5 against 87.2 in Malaysia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in resolving insolvency: recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - score between Malaysia and Taiwan, China?
- 1.3, with Taiwan, China ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malaysia and Taiwan, China?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Malaysia and Taiwan, China rank globally for resolving insolvency: recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - score?
- Malaysia ranks 18th and Taiwan, China ranks 16th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Resolving insolvency: Recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for recovery rate benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.