Malawi vs Marshall Islands: Resolving insolvency: Recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - Score
Malawi
16.76
in 2019
Marshall Islands
18.38
in 2019
Malawi rank
154th
Marshall Islands rank
152nd
Resolving insolvency: Recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - Score over time
- Malawi
- Marshall Islands
How they compare
Marshall Islands currently reports 18.38 against 16.76 in Malawi, a difference of 1.62.
That makes Marshall Islands's figure about 1.1 times Malawi's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 17 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Marshall Islands ahead.
Malawi ranks 154th and Marshall Islands ranks 152nd of 191 countries.
Marshall Islands has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malawi | Marshall Islands | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 14.03 | 19.2 | 5.17 | Marshall Islands |
| 2010s | 15.92 | 18.74 | 2.83 | Marshall Islands |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher resolving insolvency: recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - score, Malawi or Marshall Islands?
- Marshall Islands, at 18.38 against 16.76 in Malawi as of 2019.
- What is the difference in resolving insolvency: recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - score between Malawi and Marshall Islands?
- 1.62, with Marshall Islands ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and Marshall Islands?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Malawi and Marshall Islands rank globally for resolving insolvency: recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - score?
- Malawi ranks 154th and Marshall Islands ranks 152nd of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Resolving insolvency: Recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for recovery rate benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.