Madagascar vs Sierra Leone: Resolving insolvency: Recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - Score
Madagascar
13.34
in 2019
Sierra Leone
11.97
in 2019
Madagascar rank
158th
Sierra Leone rank
159th
Resolving insolvency: Recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - Score over time
- Madagascar
- Sierra Leone
How they compare
Madagascar currently reports 13.34 against 11.97 in Sierra Leone, a difference of 1.37.
That makes Madagascar's figure about 1.1 times Sierra Leone's.
Across all 17 years both countries report, Madagascar has been ahead every year.
Madagascar ranks 158th and Sierra Leone ranks 159th of 191 countries.
Madagascar has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Madagascar | Sierra Leone | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 22.46 | 9.52 | 12.94 | Madagascar |
| 2010s | 13.23 | 11.08 | 2.15 | Madagascar |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher resolving insolvency: recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - score, Madagascar or Sierra Leone?
- Madagascar, at 13.34 against 11.97 in Sierra Leone as of 2019.
- What is the difference in resolving insolvency: recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - score between Madagascar and Sierra Leone?
- 1.37, with Madagascar ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Madagascar and Sierra Leone?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Madagascar and Sierra Leone rank globally for resolving insolvency: recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - score?
- Madagascar ranks 158th and Sierra Leone ranks 159th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Resolving insolvency: Recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for recovery rate benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.