Liberia vs Marshall Islands: Resolving insolvency: Recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - Score
Liberia
18.75
in 2019
Marshall Islands
18.38
in 2019
Liberia rank
151st
Marshall Islands rank
152nd
Resolving insolvency: Recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - Score over time
- Liberia
- Marshall Islands
How they compare
Liberia currently reports 18.75 against 18.38 in Marshall Islands, a difference of 0.37.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 14 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Marshall Islands ahead.
Liberia ranks 151st and Marshall Islands ranks 152nd of 191 countries.
Marshall Islands has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Liberia | Marshall Islands | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 17.32 | 19.22 | 1.9 | Marshall Islands |
| 2010s | 18.33 | 18.74 | 0.4112 | Marshall Islands |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher resolving insolvency: recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - score, Liberia or Marshall Islands?
- Liberia, at 18.75 against 18.38 in Marshall Islands as of 2019.
- What is the difference in resolving insolvency: recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - score between Liberia and Marshall Islands?
- 0.37, with Liberia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Liberia and Marshall Islands?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2019.
- How do Liberia and Marshall Islands rank globally for resolving insolvency: recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - score?
- Liberia ranks 151st and Marshall Islands ranks 152nd of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Resolving insolvency: Recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for recovery rate benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.