Lesotho vs Tonga: Resolving insolvency: Recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - Score

Lesotho
30.23
in 2019
Tonga
30.36
in 2019
Lesotho rank
115th
Tonga rank
113th

Resolving insolvency: Recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - Score over time

  • Lesotho
  • Tonga
0102030200320112019

How they compare

Tonga currently reports 30.36 against 30.23 in Lesotho, a difference of 0.13.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 17 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Tonga ahead.

Lesotho ranks 115th and Tonga ranks 113th of 188 countries.

Lesotho has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Lesotho Tonga Difference Ahead
2000s 28.24 27.78 0.4574 Lesotho
2010s 30.61 29.21 1.4 Lesotho

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher resolving insolvency: recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - score, Lesotho or Tonga?
Tonga, at 30.36 against 30.23 in Lesotho as of 2019.
What is the difference in resolving insolvency: recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - score between Lesotho and Tonga?
0.13, with Tonga ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Lesotho and Tonga?
17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
How do Lesotho and Tonga rank globally for resolving insolvency: recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - score?
Lesotho ranks 115th and Tonga ranks 113th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Resolving insolvency: Recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Resolving insolvency: Recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 3,083 data points, 2003–2019
Last refreshed

The score for recovery rate benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.