Kyrgyzstan vs Lithuania: Resolving insolvency: Recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - Score
Kyrgyzstan
43.67
in 2019
Lithuania
43.38
in 2019
Kyrgyzstan rank
70th
Lithuania rank
73rd
Resolving insolvency: Recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - Score over time
- Kyrgyzstan
- Lithuania
How they compare
Kyrgyzstan currently reports 43.67 against 43.38 in Lithuania, a difference of 0.29.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 17 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Kyrgyzstan ahead.
Kyrgyzstan ranks 70th and Lithuania ranks 73rd of 191 countries.
Lithuania has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kyrgyzstan | Lithuania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 41.03 | 50.89 | 9.86 | Lithuania |
| 2010s | 42.37 | 46.61 | 4.24 | Lithuania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher resolving insolvency: recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - score, Kyrgyzstan or Lithuania?
- Kyrgyzstan, at 43.67 against 43.38 in Lithuania as of 2019.
- What is the difference in resolving insolvency: recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - score between Kyrgyzstan and Lithuania?
- 0.29, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kyrgyzstan and Lithuania?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Kyrgyzstan and Lithuania rank globally for resolving insolvency: recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - score?
- Kyrgyzstan ranks 70th and Lithuania ranks 73rd of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Resolving insolvency: Recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for recovery rate benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.