Kuwait vs Namibia: Resolving insolvency: Recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - Score

Kuwait
34.64
in 2019
Namibia
36.36
in 2019
Kuwait rank
96th
Namibia rank
94th

Resolving insolvency: Recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - Score over time

  • Kuwait
  • Namibia
010203040200320112019

How they compare

Namibia currently reports 36.36 against 34.64 in Kuwait, a difference of 1.72.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 17 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Kuwait ahead.

Kuwait ranks 96th and Namibia ranks 94th of 188 countries.

Namibia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kuwait Namibia Difference Ahead
2000s 31.51 34.21 2.7 Namibia
2010s 34.91 37.03 2.12 Namibia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher resolving insolvency: recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - score, Kuwait or Namibia?
Namibia, at 36.36 against 34.64 in Kuwait as of 2019.
What is the difference in resolving insolvency: recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - score between Kuwait and Namibia?
1.72, with Namibia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kuwait and Namibia?
17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
How do Kuwait and Namibia rank globally for resolving insolvency: recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - score?
Kuwait ranks 96th and Namibia ranks 94th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Resolving insolvency: Recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Resolving insolvency: Recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 3,083 data points, 2003–2019
Last refreshed

The score for recovery rate benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.