Kuwait vs Moldova, Republic of: Resolving insolvency: Recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - Score
Kuwait
34.64
in 2019
Moldova, Republic of
34.57
in 2019
Kuwait rank
98th
Moldova, Republic of rank
99th
Resolving insolvency: Recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - Score over time
- Kuwait
- Moldova, Republic of
How they compare
Kuwait currently reports 34.64 against 34.57 in Moldova, Republic of, a difference of 0.07.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 17 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Kuwait ahead.
Kuwait ranks 98th and Moldova, Republic of ranks 99th of 190 countries.
Kuwait has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kuwait | Moldova, Republic of | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 31.51 | 30.49 | 1.02 | Kuwait |
| 2010s | 34.91 | 32.62 | 2.29 | Kuwait |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher resolving insolvency: recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - score, Kuwait or Moldova, Republic of?
- Kuwait, at 34.64 against 34.57 in Moldova, Republic of as of 2019.
- What is the difference in resolving insolvency: recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - score between Kuwait and Moldova, Republic of?
- 0.07, with Kuwait ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kuwait and Moldova, Republic of?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Kuwait and Moldova, Republic of rank globally for resolving insolvency: recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - score?
- Kuwait ranks 98th and Moldova, Republic of ranks 99th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Resolving insolvency: Recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for recovery rate benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.