Republic of Korea vs Taiwan, China: Resolving insolvency: Recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - Score
Republic of Korea
90.77
in 2019
Taiwan, China
88.5
in 2019
Republic of Korea rank
14th
Taiwan, China rank
16th
Resolving insolvency: Recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - Score over time
- Republic of Korea
- Taiwan, China
How they compare
Republic of Korea currently reports 90.77 against 88.5 in Taiwan, China, a difference of 2.27.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 17 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Taiwan, China ahead.
Republic of Korea ranks 14th and Taiwan, China ranks 16th of 191 countries.
Republic of Korea has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Republic of Korea | Taiwan, China | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 87.34 | 86.83 | 0.5044 | Republic of Korea |
| 2010s | 89.65 | 88.29 | 1.36 | Republic of Korea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher resolving insolvency: recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - score, Republic of Korea or Taiwan, China?
- Republic of Korea, at 90.77 against 88.5 in Taiwan, China as of 2019.
- What is the difference in resolving insolvency: recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - score between Republic of Korea and Taiwan, China?
- 2.27, with Republic of Korea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Republic of Korea and Taiwan, China?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Republic of Korea and Taiwan, China rank globally for resolving insolvency: recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - score?
- Republic of Korea ranks 14th and Taiwan, China ranks 16th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Resolving insolvency: Recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for recovery rate benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.