Kenya vs Republic of Moldova: Resolving insolvency: Recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - Score
Kenya
34.2
in 2019
Republic of Moldova
34.57
in 2019
Kenya rank
101st
Republic of Moldova rank
99th
Resolving insolvency: Recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - Score over time
- Kenya
- Republic of Moldova
How they compare
Republic of Moldova currently reports 34.57 against 34.2 in Kenya, a difference of 0.37.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 17 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Republic of Moldova ahead.
Kenya ranks 101st and Republic of Moldova ranks 99th of 190 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Kenya averaged higher in 1 and Republic of Moldova in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kenya | Republic of Moldova | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 32.58 | 30.49 | 2.09 | Kenya |
| 2010s | 31.12 | 32.62 | 1.5 | Republic of Moldova |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher resolving insolvency: recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - score, Kenya or Republic of Moldova?
- Republic of Moldova, at 34.57 against 34.2 in Kenya as of 2019.
- What is the difference in resolving insolvency: recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - score between Kenya and Republic of Moldova?
- 0.37, with Republic of Moldova ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kenya and Republic of Moldova?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Kenya and Republic of Moldova rank globally for resolving insolvency: recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - score?
- Kenya ranks 101st and Republic of Moldova ranks 99th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Resolving insolvency: Recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for recovery rate benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.