Iceland vs Republic of Korea: Resolving insolvency: Recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - Score
Iceland
92.09
in 2019
Republic of Korea
90.77
in 2019
Iceland rank
12th
Republic of Korea rank
14th
Resolving insolvency: Recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - Score over time
- Iceland
- Republic of Korea
How they compare
Iceland currently reports 92.09 against 90.77 in Republic of Korea, a difference of 1.32.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 16 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Iceland ahead.
Iceland ranks 12th and Republic of Korea ranks 14th of 191 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Iceland averaged higher in 1 and Republic of Korea in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Iceland | Republic of Korea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 85.5 | 87.37 | 1.87 | Republic of Korea |
| 2010s | 90.67 | 89.65 | 1.02 | Iceland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher resolving insolvency: recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - score, Iceland or Republic of Korea?
- Iceland, at 92.09 against 90.77 in Republic of Korea as of 2019.
- What is the difference in resolving insolvency: recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - score between Iceland and Republic of Korea?
- 1.32, with Iceland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Republic of Korea?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2019.
- How do Iceland and Republic of Korea rank globally for resolving insolvency: recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - score?
- Iceland ranks 12th and Republic of Korea ranks 14th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Resolving insolvency: Recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for recovery rate benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.