Hong Kong, China vs Singapore: Resolving insolvency: Recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - Score
Hong Kong, China
93.85
in 2019
Singapore
95.51
in 2019
Hong Kong, China rank
9th
Singapore rank
6th
Resolving insolvency: Recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - Score over time
- Hong Kong, China
- Singapore
How they compare
Singapore currently reports 95.51 against 93.85 in Hong Kong, China, a difference of 1.66.
Across all 17 years both countries report, Singapore has been ahead every year.
Hong Kong, China ranks 9th and Singapore ranks 6th of 191 countries.
Singapore has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Hong Kong, China | Singapore | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 86.25 | 96.55 | 10.3 | Singapore |
| 2010s | 91.28 | 95.9 | 4.63 | Singapore |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher resolving insolvency: recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - score, Hong Kong, China or Singapore?
- Singapore, at 95.51 against 93.85 in Hong Kong, China as of 2019.
- What is the difference in resolving insolvency: recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - score between Hong Kong, China and Singapore?
- 1.66, with Singapore ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong, China and Singapore?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Hong Kong, China and Singapore rank globally for resolving insolvency: recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - score?
- Hong Kong, China ranks 9th and Singapore ranks 6th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Resolving insolvency: Recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for recovery rate benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.