Hong Kong, China vs Iceland: Resolving insolvency: Recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - Score
Hong Kong, China
93.85
in 2019
Iceland
92.09
in 2019
Hong Kong, China rank
9th
Iceland rank
12th
Resolving insolvency: Recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - Score over time
- Hong Kong, China
- Iceland
How they compare
Hong Kong, China currently reports 93.85 against 92.09 in Iceland, a difference of 1.76.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 16 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Iceland ahead.
Hong Kong, China ranks 9th and Iceland ranks 12th of 191 countries.
Hong Kong, China has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Hong Kong, China | Iceland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 86.06 | 85.5 | 0.5623 | Hong Kong, China |
| 2010s | 91.28 | 90.67 | 0.6024 | Hong Kong, China |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher resolving insolvency: recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - score, Hong Kong, China or Iceland?
- Hong Kong, China, at 93.85 against 92.09 in Iceland as of 2019.
- What is the difference in resolving insolvency: recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - score between Hong Kong, China and Iceland?
- 1.76, with Hong Kong, China ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong, China and Iceland?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2019.
- How do Hong Kong, China and Iceland rank globally for resolving insolvency: recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - score?
- Hong Kong, China ranks 9th and Iceland ranks 12th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Resolving insolvency: Recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for recovery rate benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.