Ghana vs Papua New Guinea: Resolving insolvency: Recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - Score
Ghana
25.82
in 2019
Papua New Guinea
26.82
in 2019
Ghana rank
129th
Papua New Guinea rank
127th
Resolving insolvency: Recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - Score over time
- Ghana
- Papua New Guinea
How they compare
Papua New Guinea currently reports 26.82 against 25.82 in Ghana, a difference of 1.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 17 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Ghana ahead.
Ghana ranks 129th and Papua New Guinea ranks 127th of 191 countries.
Ghana has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ghana | Papua New Guinea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 26.22 | 25.05 | 1.17 | Ghana |
| 2010s | 26.24 | 26.15 | 0.0946 | Ghana |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher resolving insolvency: recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - score, Ghana or Papua New Guinea?
- Papua New Guinea, at 26.82 against 25.82 in Ghana as of 2019.
- What is the difference in resolving insolvency: recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - score between Ghana and Papua New Guinea?
- 1, with Papua New Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ghana and Papua New Guinea?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Ghana and Papua New Guinea rank globally for resolving insolvency: recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - score?
- Ghana ranks 129th and Papua New Guinea ranks 127th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Resolving insolvency: Recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for recovery rate benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.