El Salvador vs Romania: Resolving insolvency: Recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - Score
El Salvador
34.92
in 2019
Romania
37.02
in 2019
El Salvador rank
98th
Romania rank
96th
Resolving insolvency: Recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - Score over time
- El Salvador
- Romania
How they compare
Romania currently reports 37.02 against 34.92 in El Salvador, a difference of 2.1.
That makes Romania's figure about 1.1 times El Salvador's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 17 shared years of data; in 2003 it was El Salvador ahead.
El Salvador ranks 98th and Romania ranks 96th of 191 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, El Salvador averaged higher in 1 and Romania in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | El Salvador | Romania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 30.48 | 21.22 | 9.25 | El Salvador |
| 2010s | 33.98 | 34.12 | 0.1372 | Romania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher resolving insolvency: recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - score, El Salvador or Romania?
- Romania, at 37.02 against 34.92 in El Salvador as of 2019.
- What is the difference in resolving insolvency: recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - score between El Salvador and Romania?
- 2.1, with Romania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and Romania?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do El Salvador and Romania rank globally for resolving insolvency: recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - score?
- El Salvador ranks 98th and Romania ranks 96th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Resolving insolvency: Recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for recovery rate benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.