Egypt vs Syrian Arab Republic: Resolving insolvency: Recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - Score
Egypt
25.1
in 2019
Syrian Arab Republic
22.76
in 2019
Egypt rank
132nd
Syrian Arab Republic rank
135th
Resolving insolvency: Recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - Score over time
- Egypt
- Syrian Arab Republic
How they compare
Egypt currently reports 25.1 against 22.76 in Syrian Arab Republic, a difference of 2.34.
That makes Egypt's figure about 1.1 times Syrian Arab Republic's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 17 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Syrian Arab Republic ahead.
Egypt ranks 132nd and Syrian Arab Republic ranks 135th of 191 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Egypt averaged higher in 1 and Syrian Arab Republic in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Egypt | Syrian Arab Republic | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 17.65 | 31.58 | 13.92 | Syrian Arab Republic |
| 2010s | 27.11 | 21.4 | 5.71 | Egypt |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher resolving insolvency: recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - score, Egypt or Syrian Arab Republic?
- Egypt, at 25.1 against 22.76 in Syrian Arab Republic as of 2019.
- What is the difference in resolving insolvency: recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - score between Egypt and Syrian Arab Republic?
- 2.34, with Egypt ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Egypt and Syrian Arab Republic?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Egypt and Syrian Arab Republic rank globally for resolving insolvency: recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - score?
- Egypt ranks 132nd and Syrian Arab Republic ranks 135th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Resolving insolvency: Recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for recovery rate benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.