Dominican Republic vs Suriname: Resolving insolvency: Recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - Score
Dominican Republic
10.32
in 2019
Suriname
8.28
in 2019
Dominican Republic rank
161st
Suriname rank
163rd
Resolving insolvency: Recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - Score over time
- Dominican Republic
- Suriname
How they compare
Dominican Republic currently reports 10.32 against 8.28 in Suriname, a difference of 2.04.
That makes Dominican Republic's figure about 1.2 times Suriname's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Suriname ahead.
Dominican Republic ranks 161st and Suriname ranks 163rd of 191 countries.
Dominican Republic has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Dominican Republic | Suriname | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 8.38 | 8.06 | 0.3292 | Dominican Republic |
| 2010s | 9.76 | 8.93 | 0.8252 | Dominican Republic |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher resolving insolvency: recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - score, Dominican Republic or Suriname?
- Dominican Republic, at 10.32 against 8.28 in Suriname as of 2019.
- What is the difference in resolving insolvency: recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - score between Dominican Republic and Suriname?
- 2.04, with Dominican Republic ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Dominican Republic and Suriname?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Dominican Republic and Suriname rank globally for resolving insolvency: recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - score?
- Dominican Republic ranks 161st and Suriname ranks 163rd of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Resolving insolvency: Recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for recovery rate benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.