Dominican Republic vs Madagascar: Resolving insolvency: Recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - Score
Dominican Republic
10.32
in 2019
Madagascar
13.34
in 2019
Dominican Republic rank
161st
Madagascar rank
158th
Resolving insolvency: Recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - Score over time
- Dominican Republic
- Madagascar
How they compare
Madagascar currently reports 13.34 against 10.32 in Dominican Republic, a difference of 3.02.
That makes Madagascar's figure about 1.3 times Dominican Republic's.
Across all 17 years both countries report, Madagascar has been ahead every year.
Dominican Republic ranks 161st and Madagascar ranks 158th of 191 countries.
Madagascar has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Dominican Republic | Madagascar | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 7.76 | 22.46 | 14.7 | Madagascar |
| 2010s | 9.76 | 13.23 | 3.47 | Madagascar |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher resolving insolvency: recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - score, Dominican Republic or Madagascar?
- Madagascar, at 13.34 against 10.32 in Dominican Republic as of 2019.
- What is the difference in resolving insolvency: recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - score between Dominican Republic and Madagascar?
- 3.02, with Madagascar ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Dominican Republic and Madagascar?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Dominican Republic and Madagascar rank globally for resolving insolvency: recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - score?
- Dominican Republic ranks 161st and Madagascar ranks 158th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Resolving insolvency: Recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for recovery rate benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.