Djibouti vs Russian Federation: Resolving insolvency: Recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - Score
Djibouti
47.34
in 2019
Russian Federation
46.32
in 2019
Djibouti rank
58th
Russian Federation rank
61st
Resolving insolvency: Recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - Score over time
- Djibouti
- Russian Federation
How they compare
Djibouti currently reports 47.34 against 46.32 in Russian Federation, a difference of 1.02.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Russian Federation ahead.
Djibouti ranks 58th and Russian Federation ranks 61st of 191 countries.
Russian Federation has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Djibouti | Russian Federation | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 40.51 | 44.89 | 4.37 | Russian Federation |
| 2010s | 41.33 | 44.74 | 3.42 | Russian Federation |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher resolving insolvency: recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - score, Djibouti or Russian Federation?
- Djibouti, at 47.34 against 46.32 in Russian Federation as of 2019.
- What is the difference in resolving insolvency: recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - score between Djibouti and Russian Federation?
- 1.02, with Djibouti ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Djibouti and Russian Federation?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Djibouti and Russian Federation rank globally for resolving insolvency: recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - score?
- Djibouti ranks 58th and Russian Federation ranks 61st of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Resolving insolvency: Recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for recovery rate benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.