China vs Iran, Islamic Republic of: Resolving insolvency: Recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - Score
China
39.77
in 2019
Iran, Islamic Republic of
38.9
in 2019
China rank
86th
Iran, Islamic Republic of rank
88th
Resolving insolvency: Recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - Score over time
- China
- Iran, Islamic Republic of
How they compare
China currently reports 39.77 against 38.9 in Iran, Islamic Republic of, a difference of 0.87.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 17 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Iran, Islamic Republic of ahead.
China ranks 86th and Iran, Islamic Republic of ranks 88th of 191 countries.
Iran, Islamic Republic of has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | China | Iran, Islamic Republic of | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 35.81 | 41.21 | 5.4 | Iran, Islamic Republic of |
| 2010s | 39.2 | 41.78 | 2.58 | Iran, Islamic Republic of |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher resolving insolvency: recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - score, China or Iran, Islamic Republic of?
- China, at 39.77 against 38.9 in Iran, Islamic Republic of as of 2019.
- What is the difference in resolving insolvency: recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - score between China and Iran, Islamic Republic of?
- 0.87, with China ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China and Iran, Islamic Republic of?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do China and Iran, Islamic Republic of rank globally for resolving insolvency: recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - score?
- China ranks 86th and Iran, Islamic Republic of ranks 88th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Resolving insolvency: Recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for recovery rate benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.