China (People’s Republic of) vs Eswatini: Resolving insolvency: Recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - Score
China (People’s Republic of)
39.77
in 2019
Eswatini
40.25
in 2019
China (People’s Republic of) rank
85th
Eswatini rank
83rd
Resolving insolvency: Recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - Score over time
- China (People’s Republic of)
- Eswatini
How they compare
Eswatini currently reports 40.25 against 39.77 in China (People’s Republic of), a difference of 0.48.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Eswatini ahead.
China (People’s Republic of) ranks 85th and Eswatini ranks 83rd of 190 countries.
Eswatini has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | China (People’s Republic of) | Eswatini | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 36.49 | 38.81 | 2.33 | Eswatini |
| 2010s | 39.2 | 40.9 | 1.7 | Eswatini |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher resolving insolvency: recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - score, China (People’s Republic of) or Eswatini?
- Eswatini, at 40.25 against 39.77 in China (People’s Republic of) as of 2019.
- What is the difference in resolving insolvency: recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - score between China (People’s Republic of) and Eswatini?
- 0.48, with Eswatini ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China (People’s Republic of) and Eswatini?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do China (People’s Republic of) and Eswatini rank globally for resolving insolvency: recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - score?
- China (People’s Republic of) ranks 85th and Eswatini ranks 83rd of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Resolving insolvency: Recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for recovery rate benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.