Chile vs Russian Federation: Resolving insolvency: Recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - Score
Chile
45.13
in 2019
Russian Federation
46.32
in 2019
Chile rank
64th
Russian Federation rank
61st
Resolving insolvency: Recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - Score over time
- Chile
- Russian Federation
How they compare
Russian Federation currently reports 46.32 against 45.13 in Chile, a difference of 1.19.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 17 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Russian Federation ahead.
Chile ranks 64th and Russian Federation ranks 61st of 191 countries.
Russian Federation has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Russian Federation | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 27.65 | 44.19 | 16.54 | Russian Federation |
| 2010s | 37.29 | 44.74 | 7.45 | Russian Federation |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher resolving insolvency: recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - score, Chile or Russian Federation?
- Russian Federation, at 46.32 against 45.13 in Chile as of 2019.
- What is the difference in resolving insolvency: recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - score between Chile and Russian Federation?
- 1.19, with Russian Federation ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Russian Federation?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Chile and Russian Federation rank globally for resolving insolvency: recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - score?
- Chile ranks 64th and Russian Federation ranks 61st of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Resolving insolvency: Recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for recovery rate benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.