Cameroon vs Marshall Islands: Resolving insolvency: Recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - Score
Cameroon
17
in 2019
Marshall Islands
18.38
in 2019
Cameroon rank
152nd
Marshall Islands rank
151st
Resolving insolvency: Recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - Score over time
- Cameroon
- Marshall Islands
How they compare
Marshall Islands currently reports 18.38 against 17 in Cameroon, a difference of 1.38.
That makes Marshall Islands's figure about 1.1 times Cameroon's.
Across all 17 years both countries report, Marshall Islands has been ahead every year.
Cameroon ranks 152nd and Marshall Islands ranks 151st of 190 countries.
Marshall Islands has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cameroon | Marshall Islands | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 13.7 | 19.2 | 5.49 | Marshall Islands |
| 2010s | 16.21 | 18.74 | 2.53 | Marshall Islands |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher resolving insolvency: recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - score, Cameroon or Marshall Islands?
- Marshall Islands, at 18.38 against 17 in Cameroon as of 2019.
- What is the difference in resolving insolvency: recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - score between Cameroon and Marshall Islands?
- 1.38, with Marshall Islands ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cameroon and Marshall Islands?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Cameroon and Marshall Islands rank globally for resolving insolvency: recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - score?
- Cameroon ranks 152nd and Marshall Islands ranks 151st of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Resolving insolvency: Recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for recovery rate benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.