Cambodia vs Madagascar: Resolving insolvency: Recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - Score
Cambodia
15.76
in 2019
Madagascar
13.34
in 2019
Cambodia rank
155th
Madagascar rank
157th
Resolving insolvency: Recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - Score over time
- Cambodia
- Madagascar
How they compare
Cambodia currently reports 15.76 against 13.34 in Madagascar, a difference of 2.42.
That makes Cambodia's figure about 1.2 times Madagascar's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 17 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Madagascar ahead.
Cambodia ranks 155th and Madagascar ranks 157th of 190 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Cambodia averaged higher in 1 and Madagascar in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cambodia | Madagascar | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 11.49 | 22.46 | 10.97 | Madagascar |
| 2010s | 14.05 | 13.23 | 0.8221 | Cambodia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher resolving insolvency: recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - score, Cambodia or Madagascar?
- Cambodia, at 15.76 against 13.34 in Madagascar as of 2019.
- What is the difference in resolving insolvency: recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - score between Cambodia and Madagascar?
- 2.42, with Cambodia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cambodia and Madagascar?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Cambodia and Madagascar rank globally for resolving insolvency: recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - score?
- Cambodia ranks 155th and Madagascar ranks 157th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Resolving insolvency: Recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for recovery rate benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.