Burundi vs Micronesia, Federated States of: Resolving insolvency: Recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - Score
Resolving insolvency: Recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - Score over time
- Burundi
- Micronesia, Federated States of
How they compare
Burundi currently reports 8.1 against 3.71 in Micronesia, Federated States of, a difference of 4.39.
That makes Burundi's figure about 2.2 times Micronesia, Federated States of's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 17 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Micronesia, Federated States of ahead.
Burundi ranks 164th and Micronesia, Federated States of ranks 166th of 191 countries.
Burundi has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Burundi | Micronesia, Federated States of | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 5.21 | 3.53 | 1.68 | Burundi |
| 2010s | 8.29 | 3.55 | 4.74 | Burundi |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher resolving insolvency: recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - score, Burundi or Micronesia, Federated States of?
- Burundi, at 8.1 against 3.71 in Micronesia, Federated States of as of 2019.
- What is the difference in resolving insolvency: recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - score between Burundi and Micronesia, Federated States of?
- 4.39, with Burundi ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Burundi and Micronesia, Federated States of?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Burundi and Micronesia, Federated States of rank globally for resolving insolvency: recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - score?
- Burundi ranks 164th and Micronesia, Federated States of ranks 166th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Resolving insolvency: Recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for recovery rate benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.