Burkina Faso vs Solomon Islands: Resolving insolvency: Recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - Score
Burkina Faso
25.39
in 2019
Solomon Islands
26.24
in 2019
Burkina Faso rank
131st
Solomon Islands rank
128th
Resolving insolvency: Recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - Score over time
- Burkina Faso
- Solomon Islands
How they compare
Solomon Islands currently reports 26.24 against 25.39 in Burkina Faso, a difference of 0.85.
Across all 17 years both countries report, Solomon Islands has been ahead every year.
Burkina Faso ranks 131st and Solomon Islands ranks 128th of 191 countries.
Solomon Islands has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Burkina Faso | Solomon Islands | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 12.89 | 25.14 | 12.25 | Solomon Islands |
| 2010s | 21.99 | 26.02 | 4.04 | Solomon Islands |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher resolving insolvency: recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - score, Burkina Faso or Solomon Islands?
- Solomon Islands, at 26.24 against 25.39 in Burkina Faso as of 2019.
- What is the difference in resolving insolvency: recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - score between Burkina Faso and Solomon Islands?
- 0.85, with Solomon Islands ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Burkina Faso and Solomon Islands?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Burkina Faso and Solomon Islands rank globally for resolving insolvency: recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - score?
- Burkina Faso ranks 131st and Solomon Islands ranks 128th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Resolving insolvency: Recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for recovery rate benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.