Brunei Darussalam vs Slovakia: Resolving insolvency: Recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - Score
Brunei Darussalam
50.84
in 2019
Slovakia
49.65
in 2019
Brunei Darussalam rank
50th
Slovakia rank
53rd
Resolving insolvency: Recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - Score over time
- Brunei Darussalam
- Slovakia
How they compare
Brunei Darussalam currently reports 50.84 against 49.65 in Slovakia, a difference of 1.19.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 14 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Slovakia ahead.
Brunei Darussalam ranks 50th and Slovakia ranks 53rd of 191 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Brunei Darussalam averaged higher in 1 and Slovakia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brunei Darussalam | Slovakia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 49.82 | 49.81 | 0.0081 | Brunei Darussalam |
| 2010s | 50.84 | 56.43 | 5.58 | Slovakia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher resolving insolvency: recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - score, Brunei Darussalam or Slovakia?
- Brunei Darussalam, at 50.84 against 49.65 in Slovakia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in resolving insolvency: recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - score between Brunei Darussalam and Slovakia?
- 1.19, with Brunei Darussalam ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brunei Darussalam and Slovakia?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2019.
- How do Brunei Darussalam and Slovakia rank globally for resolving insolvency: recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - score?
- Brunei Darussalam ranks 50th and Slovakia ranks 53rd of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Resolving insolvency: Recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for recovery rate benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.