Brunei Darussalam vs North Macedonia: Resolving insolvency: Recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - Score
Brunei Darussalam
50.84
in 2019
North Macedonia
51.7
in 2019
Brunei Darussalam rank
50th
North Macedonia rank
49th
Resolving insolvency: Recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - Score over time
- Brunei Darussalam
- North Macedonia
How they compare
North Macedonia currently reports 51.7 against 50.84 in Brunei Darussalam, a difference of 0.86.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 14 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Brunei Darussalam ahead.
Brunei Darussalam ranks 50th and North Macedonia ranks 49th of 191 countries.
Brunei Darussalam has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brunei Darussalam | North Macedonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 49.82 | 43.72 | 6.1 | Brunei Darussalam |
| 2010s | 50.84 | 48.32 | 2.53 | Brunei Darussalam |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher resolving insolvency: recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - score, Brunei Darussalam or North Macedonia?
- North Macedonia, at 51.7 against 50.84 in Brunei Darussalam as of 2019.
- What is the difference in resolving insolvency: recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - score between Brunei Darussalam and North Macedonia?
- 0.86, with North Macedonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brunei Darussalam and North Macedonia?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2019.
- How do Brunei Darussalam and North Macedonia rank globally for resolving insolvency: recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - score?
- Brunei Darussalam ranks 50th and North Macedonia ranks 49th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Resolving insolvency: Recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for recovery rate benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.