Brunei Darussalam vs Maldives: Resolving insolvency: Recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - Score
Brunei Darussalam
50.84
in 2019
Maldives
54.08
in 2019
Brunei Darussalam rank
50th
Maldives rank
47th
Resolving insolvency: Recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - Score over time
- Brunei Darussalam
- Maldives
How they compare
Maldives currently reports 54.08 against 50.84 in Brunei Darussalam, a difference of 3.24.
That makes Maldives's figure about 1.1 times Brunei Darussalam's.
Across all 14 years both countries report, Maldives has been ahead every year.
Brunei Darussalam ranks 50th and Maldives ranks 47th of 191 countries.
Maldives has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brunei Darussalam | Maldives | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 49.82 | 52.42 | 2.6 | Maldives |
| 2010s | 50.84 | 53.89 | 3.05 | Maldives |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher resolving insolvency: recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - score, Brunei Darussalam or Maldives?
- Maldives, at 54.08 against 50.84 in Brunei Darussalam as of 2019.
- What is the difference in resolving insolvency: recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - score between Brunei Darussalam and Maldives?
- 3.24, with Maldives ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brunei Darussalam and Maldives?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2019.
- How do Brunei Darussalam and Maldives rank globally for resolving insolvency: recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - score?
- Brunei Darussalam ranks 50th and Maldives ranks 47th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Resolving insolvency: Recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for recovery rate benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.