Brazil vs Marshall Islands: Resolving insolvency: Recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - Score
Brazil
19.56
in 2019
Marshall Islands
18.38
in 2019
Brazil rank
149th
Marshall Islands rank
152nd
Resolving insolvency: Recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - Score over time
- Brazil
- Marshall Islands
How they compare
Brazil currently reports 19.56 against 18.38 in Marshall Islands, a difference of 1.18.
That makes Brazil's figure about 1.1 times Marshall Islands's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 17 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Marshall Islands ahead.
Brazil ranks 149th and Marshall Islands ranks 152nd of 191 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Brazil averaged higher in 1 and Marshall Islands in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brazil | Marshall Islands | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 9.5 | 19.2 | 9.69 | Marshall Islands |
| 2010s | 19.36 | 18.74 | 0.6135 | Brazil |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher resolving insolvency: recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - score, Brazil or Marshall Islands?
- Brazil, at 19.56 against 18.38 in Marshall Islands as of 2019.
- What is the difference in resolving insolvency: recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - score between Brazil and Marshall Islands?
- 1.18, with Brazil ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Marshall Islands?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Brazil and Marshall Islands rank globally for resolving insolvency: recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - score?
- Brazil ranks 149th and Marshall Islands ranks 152nd of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Resolving insolvency: Recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for recovery rate benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.