Botswana vs Mauritius: Resolving insolvency: Recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - Score

Botswana
71.4
in 2019
Mauritius
72.5
in 2019
Botswana rank
33rd
Mauritius rank
31st

Resolving insolvency: Recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - Score over time

  • Botswana
  • Mauritius
020406080200320112019

How they compare

Mauritius currently reports 72.5 against 71.4 in Botswana, a difference of 1.1.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 16 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Mauritius ahead.

Botswana ranks 33rd and Mauritius ranks 31st of 188 countries.

Mauritius has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Botswana Mauritius Difference Ahead
2000s 59.66 60.02 0.3585 Mauritius
2010s 68.39 70.33 1.94 Mauritius

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher resolving insolvency: recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - score, Botswana or Mauritius?
Mauritius, at 72.5 against 71.4 in Botswana as of 2019.
What is the difference in resolving insolvency: recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - score between Botswana and Mauritius?
1.1, with Mauritius ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Mauritius?
16 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2019.
How do Botswana and Mauritius rank globally for resolving insolvency: recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - score?
Botswana ranks 33rd and Mauritius ranks 31st of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Resolving insolvency: Recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Resolving insolvency: Recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 3,083 data points, 2003–2019
Last refreshed

The score for recovery rate benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.