Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Seychelles: Resolving insolvency: Recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - Score
Bosnia and Herzegovina
42.68
in 2019
Seychelles
41.82
in 2019
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
77th
Seychelles rank
82nd
Resolving insolvency: Recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - Score over time
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Seychelles
How they compare
Bosnia and Herzegovina currently reports 42.68 against 41.82 in Seychelles, a difference of 0.86.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Seychelles ahead.
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 77th and Seychelles ranks 82nd of 191 countries.
Seychelles has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bosnia and Herzegovina | Seychelles | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 37.49 | 43.01 | 5.52 | Seychelles |
| 2010s | 39.52 | 41.87 | 2.35 | Seychelles |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher resolving insolvency: recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - score, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Seychelles?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina, at 42.68 against 41.82 in Seychelles as of 2019.
- What is the difference in resolving insolvency: recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - score between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Seychelles?
- 0.86, with Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Seychelles?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Seychelles rank globally for resolving insolvency: recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - score?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 77th and Seychelles ranks 82nd of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Resolving insolvency: Recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for recovery rate benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.