Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Kazakhstan: Resolving insolvency: Recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - Score
Bosnia and Herzegovina
42.68
in 2019
Kazakhstan
42.83
in 2019
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
77th
Kazakhstan rank
75th
Resolving insolvency: Recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - Score over time
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Kazakhstan
How they compare
Kazakhstan currently reports 42.83 against 42.68 in Bosnia and Herzegovina, a difference of 0.15.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 17 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 77th and Kazakhstan ranks 75th of 191 countries.
Kazakhstan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bosnia and Herzegovina | Kazakhstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 36.84 | 39.46 | 2.61 | Kazakhstan |
| 2010s | 39.52 | 44.87 | 5.35 | Kazakhstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher resolving insolvency: recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - score, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Kazakhstan?
- Kazakhstan, at 42.83 against 42.68 in Bosnia and Herzegovina as of 2019.
- What is the difference in resolving insolvency: recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - score between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Kazakhstan?
- 0.15, with Kazakhstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Kazakhstan?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Kazakhstan rank globally for resolving insolvency: recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - score?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 77th and Kazakhstan ranks 75th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Resolving insolvency: Recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for recovery rate benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.