Bolivia (Plurinational State of) vs Oman: Resolving insolvency: Recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - Score
Bolivia (Plurinational State of)
43.96
in 2019
Oman
44.22
in 2019
Bolivia (Plurinational State of) rank
69th
Oman rank
68th
Resolving insolvency: Recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - Score over time
- Bolivia (Plurinational State of)
- Oman
How they compare
Oman currently reports 44.22 against 43.96 in Bolivia (Plurinational State of), a difference of 0.26.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 17 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Oman ahead.
Bolivia (Plurinational State of) ranks 69th and Oman ranks 68th of 190 countries.
Oman has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bolivia (Plurinational State of) | Oman | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 39.73 | 41.44 | 1.71 | Oman |
| 2010s | 42.89 | 43.78 | 0.8876 | Oman |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher resolving insolvency: recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - score, Bolivia (Plurinational State of) or Oman?
- Oman, at 44.22 against 43.96 in Bolivia (Plurinational State of) as of 2019.
- What is the difference in resolving insolvency: recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - score between Bolivia (Plurinational State of) and Oman?
- 0.26, with Oman ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bolivia (Plurinational State of) and Oman?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Bolivia (Plurinational State of) and Oman rank globally for resolving insolvency: recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - score?
- Bolivia (Plurinational State of) ranks 69th and Oman ranks 68th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Resolving insolvency: Recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for recovery rate benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.