Bolivia, Plurinational State of vs Nepal: Resolving insolvency: Recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - Score
Bolivia, Plurinational State of
43.96
in 2019
Nepal
44.4
in 2019
Bolivia, Plurinational State of rank
69th
Nepal rank
67th
Resolving insolvency: Recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - Score over time
- Bolivia, Plurinational State of
- Nepal
How they compare
Nepal currently reports 44.4 against 43.96 in Bolivia, Plurinational State of, a difference of 0.44.
Across all 17 years both countries report, Nepal has been ahead every year.
Bolivia, Plurinational State of ranks 69th and Nepal ranks 67th of 190 countries.
Nepal has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bolivia, Plurinational State of | Nepal | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 39.73 | 47.11 | 7.38 | Nepal |
| 2010s | 42.89 | 46.05 | 3.16 | Nepal |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher resolving insolvency: recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - score, Bolivia, Plurinational State of or Nepal?
- Nepal, at 44.4 against 43.96 in Bolivia, Plurinational State of as of 2019.
- What is the difference in resolving insolvency: recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - score between Bolivia, Plurinational State of and Nepal?
- 0.44, with Nepal ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bolivia, Plurinational State of and Nepal?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Bolivia, Plurinational State of and Nepal rank globally for resolving insolvency: recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - score?
- Bolivia, Plurinational State of ranks 69th and Nepal ranks 67th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Resolving insolvency: Recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for recovery rate benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.